October 19, 2008 at 2:35 AM
Have you ever considered including some sort of identifier with each piece that shows before you click on it whether it is poetry, fiction or non fiction?
Most of what is here is poetry. I have reviewed a couple of them, but I really have no business doing so. I don't have the knowledge to give a critique that will do anyone any good.
So it ends up with a lot of clck-throughs to find something I can review.
Just a thought,
Thoughts on the Walking Wounded
Casualties of the Gender War.
http://www.thehappymisogynist.com
October 19, 2008 at 4:18 AM
You know, if you go to the articles section
They have the archive sorted, so you can choose to see poetry, stories, etc...
,':)
October 19, 2008 at 9:15 AM
LB - most of us really have no business reviewing poetry! The key is that you write what you feel - and you critique in the way you know how to - at the end of the day, critique from a reader is far better than really technical critique! Having read your critique on poetry - you are no worse than us 'prolific' reviewers......
To be or not to be....that is totally illogical captain.....Spock.
http://personalopinionator.blogspot.com
October 19, 2008 at 9:39 AM
Site Administrator
Posts: 328
imdeadgoaway said:
You know, if you go to the articles section
They have the archive sorted, so you can choose to see poetry, stories, etc...
SimeyCook said:
LB - most of us really have no business reviewing poetry! The key is that you write what you feel - and you critique in the way you know how to - at the end of the day, critique from a reader is far better than really technical critique! Having read your critique on poetry - you are no worse than us 'prolific' reviewers......
Couldn't have said it better myself. Need any more clarifications or have any other questions Lester?
October 19, 2008 at 10:35 AM
Fair enough, guys. I'll heed the advice on both. Thanks.
Thoughts on the Walking Wounded
Casualties of the Gender War.
http://www.thehappymisogynist.com
